After the as had been issued as a cast coin for about seventy years, and its weight had been reduced in several stages, a sextantal as was introduced (meaning that it weighed one-sixth of a pound). At about the same time a silver coin, the denarius, was also introduced. Earlier Roman silver coins had been struck on the Greek weight standards that facilitated their use in southern Italy and across the Adriatic, but all Roman coins were now on a Roman weight standard. The denarius, or 'tenner', was at first tariffed at ten asses, but in about 140 BC it was retariffed at sixteen asses. This is said to have been a result of financing the Punic Wars.
And, in fact, the stories of the collared lizard and the Asiatic wild ass are uncannily similar. Both the collared lizard and the wild ass had gone extinct locally and both had been reintroduced from surviving populations at the beginning of the 1980s. In both cases, the initial population was small: 29 collared lizards and, eventually, 38 wild asses.
asses
Bar David, Bouskila and Templeton, who recently received a new grant from the U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation, which has been funding their work, plan to collar seven or eight more asses when they begin to congregate around the waterholes this summer.
Remember, too, that process assessments are subjective and students are not always straightforward when evaluating one another or themselves. However, in combination with product assessments and individual assessments, they can offer valuable glimpses into how teams function and alert you to major problems (e.g., particularly problematic team members or serious conflict), which can help to inform your feedback and grading.
How can you assess conditions for learning and development, as well as social and emotional competencies? The Stop, Think, Act: Ready to Assess toolkit, available at no cost, helps educators, practitioners, and policymakers decide if and when they are ready to take those steps.
The Department of the Treasury's Federal Insurance Office (FIO) and the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) both have taken steps to understand the financial implications of growing cybersecurity risks. However, they have not assessed the extent to which risks to critical infrastructure from catastrophic cyber incidents and potential financial exposures warrant a federal insurance response. CISA is the primary risk advisor on critical infrastructure and FIO the federal monitor of the insurance sector. Accordingly, they are well-positioned to jointly perform such an assessment. Doing so and reporting the results to Congress can inform deliberations on whether a federal insurance response is warranted.
The Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, includes a provision for GAO to study cyber risks to U.S. critical infrastructure and available insurance for these risks. This report examines the extent to which (1) cyber risks for critical infrastructure exist; (2) private insurance covers catastrophic cyber losses and TRIP provides a backstop for such losses; and (3) cognizant federal agencies have assessed a potential federal response for cyberattacks.
CISA and FIO should jointly assess the extent to which risks to critical infrastructure from catastrophic cyber incidents and potential financial exposures warrant a federal insurance response, and inform Congress of the results of their assessment. Both agencies agreed with the recommendations.
The Revenue Act, MCL 205.1 et seq, 1941 PA 122, provides the procedures for administration, audit, assessment, appeal and collection of tax liability for all taxes administered under the Revenue Act. Some of the taxes administered under the Revenue Act are income tax, sales tax, use tax, withholding tax, Michigan Business tax, Single Business tax, Corporate Income tax, motor fuel tax and tobacco products tax.
ACCESS for ELLs (ACCESS) is the collective name for WIDA's suite of summative English language proficiency assessments. ACCESS is taken annually by English learners in kindergarten through grade 12 in WIDA Consortium member states.
While a positive antibody test result can be used to help identify people who may have had a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, more research is needed in people who have received a COVID-19 vaccination. Currently authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests have not been evaluated to assess the level of protection provided by an immune response to COVID-19 vaccination. If antibody test results are interpreted incorrectly, there is a potential risk that people may take fewer precautions against SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Taking fewer steps to protect against SARS-CoV-2 can increase their risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and may result in the increased spread of SARS-CoV-2.
In Comfort factor, indicate the buffer you want to use during assessment. This accounts for issues like seasonal usage, short performance history, and likely increases in future usage. For example, if you use a comfort factor of two:
For performance-based assessments, we recommend that you wait at least a day after starting discovery before you create an assessment. This provides time to collect performance data with higher confidence. Ideally, after you start discovery, wait for the performance duration you specify (day/week/month) for a high-confidence rating.
The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) is a self-assessment used by both program staff and stakeholders to evaluate the sustainability capacity of a program. When you take the assessment online, you will receive a summary report of your overall sustainability, which can be used to help with sustainability planning. The first Program Sustainability Framework was developed with funding from the National Association of Chronic Disease Directors. Revision and distribution of the tool is funded by the Centers for Disease Control, Office on Smoking and Health.
We worked with partners to translate the PSAT so that the tool is valid and reliable in both English and Spanish. You can access the PSAT in English and Spanish by downloading the assessment as a PDF to administer offline. Currently, only the English version of the PSAT is available to complete online. If you are interested in working with us to translate the PSAT into another language, please contact us.
When doing a group assessment, we recommend multiple staff and stakeholders assess the same program. This makes sure many perspectives are included in the final sustainability report. Each individual can participate anonymously and will receive their own personal results. You can decide if you want to complete an assessment for a program or just invite others to complete the assessment. Only you will have access to the final group sustainability report.
When the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool was developed, we piloted it in trainings and evaluations with over 550 individuals and over 250 unique programs at state and local levels. We ran extensive psychometric analyses on pilot data to improve the framework and assessment. The final Sustainability Framework and Assessment Tool has been reliability tested and can be used by programs in many levels and settings to better understand and plan for sustainability.
In response to feedback from partners, we rolled out a slightly different version of the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool in December 2013. In this updated version (V2), the Political Support domain (internal and external environments that support your program) was renamed Environmental Support (having a supportive internal and external climate for your program). In addition, four of the five domain items were changed to remove references to politics and policy and to focus on champions and leadership instead. These changes were made to broaden the relevance of the assessment to programs in different settings.
First make sure you have clearly defined the set of activities you would like to assess. The CSAT assesses the sustainability capacity of a clinical practice, such as a mental health screening procedure or a hand hygiene process. The PSAT assesses a wide range of programs in public health and other fields (e.g., social services and education), such as a healthy school lunch initiative or an adult literacy program.
If you are still unsure of which tool to use, you can read about and compare the CSAT domains and the PSAT domains. You can also preview the CSAT questions and the PSAT questions. Think about how the domains and questions apply to the set of activities you would like to assess. One tool may stand out as more useful for your purposes.
We recommend that multiple staff and stakeholders take the assessment individually for a more complete picture of your program. When you create an account, you have the option to set up a Group Assessment and invite multiple people to individually complete the assessment tool. Results are then averaged together in a Group Sustainability Report.
Program staff, leadership, evaluators, partners, and funders are all encouraged to use the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool and engage in sustainability planning. In fact, we recommend that multiple staff and stakeholders take the assessment individually for a more complete picture of your program.
The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool is a 40 item self-assessment that program staff and stakeholders can take to evaluate the sustainability capacity of a program. We define sustainability capacity as the ability to maintain programming and its benefits over time. When you take the assessment online you will receive an automated summary report of your overall sustainability. You can use these results to engage in sustainability planning.
Korn Ferry's global pulse surveys gathers insights into how organizations are adapting their reward programs in response to a rapidly changing world, and to assess how their plans for future rewards programs are evolving. 2ff7e9595c
Comments